Blakely v. Tatarsky

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Blakely v. Tatarsky. Read the opinion of the Court — 385 F. App'x 343
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2010·No. 09-7832·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7832

JAMES G. BLAKELY, a/k/a Jimmy G. Blakely,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DAVID M. TATARSKY, Intrimal General Counsel; MS. SIMON, Mailroom Supervisor for Lee Correctional; A PADULA, Warden; JON OZMINT, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (4:08-cv-03609-MBS)

Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: June 29, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James G. Blakely, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Johnson, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James G. Blakely appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blakely

v. Tatarsky, No. 4:08-cv-03609-MBS (D.S.C. filed Sept. 1, 2009 &

entered Sept. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blakely v. Tatarsky, (4th Cir. 2010).

Blakely v. Tatarsky (Blakely v. Tatarsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related