Blakely v. Tatarsky
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7832
JAMES G. BLAKELY, a/k/a Jimmy G. Blakely,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID M. TATARSKY, Intrimal General Counsel; MS. SIMON, Mailroom Supervisor for Lee Correctional; A PADULA, Warden; JON OZMINT, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (4:08-cv-03609-MBS)
Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: June 29, 2010
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James G. Blakely, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Johnson, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James G. Blakely appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blakely
v. Tatarsky, No. 4:08-cv-03609-MBS (D.S.C. filed Sept. 1, 2009 &
entered Sept. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blakely v. Tatarsky (Blakely v. Tatarsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.