Blakely v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blakely v. State

467 So. 2d 838, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1093, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13755

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 1, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1572

StatusPublished

This text of 467 So. 2d 838 (Blakely v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blakely v. State, 467 So. 2d 838, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1093, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13755 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude it was harmful error not to instruct the jury as requested. Accordingly, we reverse only the conviction of resisting arrest without violence and remand for new trial on Count III. We affirm all of the remaining convictions.

The parties agree, as do we, that the trial court erred in imposing more than six months’ probation for the two second degree misdemeanors. We remand for correction of the sentences.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude it was harmful error not to instruct the jury as requested. Accordingly, we reverse only the conviction of resisting arrest without violence and remand for new trial on Count III. We affirm all of the remaining convictions.

The parties agree, as do we, that the trial court erred in imposing more than six months’ probation for the two second degree misdemeanors. We remand for correction of the sentences.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

467 So. 2d 838, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1093, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blakely-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.