Blakely v. Fish
This text of 30 F. Cas. 967 (Blakely v. Fish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF
This is an action on the case brought by the.appellee against the appellant. The appellant in the court below demurred to the declaration, which demurrer was overruled, and he excepted and prayed an appeal to this court, which seems to have been granted. It does not appear from the record that the court proceeded to give final judgment in favor of either party. We are clearly of opinion, that an appeal will not lie except from the final decision or judgment of the court; and here there being no final judgment, this court has no jurisdiction. Geyer’s Dig. 261; [Rutherford v. Fisher] 4 Dall. [4 U. S.] 22; [M’Clay v. Hanna] Id. 160; [Young v. Grundy] 6 Cranch [10 U. S.] 51. Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 F. Cas. 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blakely-v-fish-ark-1822.