Blakely v. Callahan
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-60800 (Summary Calendar)
HAROLD J. BLAKELY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JOHN J. CALLAHAN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (USDC No. 2:95-CV-108-PG) - - - - - - - - - - July 28, 1997
Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Harold J. Blakely appeals from the district court’s judgment
affirming the denial of his application for supplemental security
income. Blakely argues that substantial evidence did not exist to
support the finding that he was not disabled and that a prior
application should have been reopened. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Further, this court lacks
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. jurisdiction to address Blakely’s argument that his previous
application should have been reopened. See Torres v. Shalala, 48
F.3d 887, 890 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the judgment of the
district court is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blakely v. Callahan (Blakely v. Callahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.