Blakely v. Callahan

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 8, 1997·No. 96-60800·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60800 (Summary Calendar)

HAROLD J. BLAKELY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN J. CALLAHAN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (USDC No. 2:95-CV-108-PG) - - - - - - - - - - July 28, 1997

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Harold J. Blakely appeals from the district court’s judgment

affirming the denial of his application for supplemental security

income. Blakely argues that substantial evidence did not exist to

support the finding that he was not disabled and that a prior

application should have been reopened. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Further, this court lacks

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. jurisdiction to address Blakely’s argument that his previous

application should have been reopened. See Torres v. Shalala, 48

F.3d 887, 890 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blakely v. Callahan, (5th Cir. 1997).

Blakely v. Callahan (Blakely v. Callahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related