Blake v. Worsham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Blake v. Worsham

489 S.W.3d 885, 2016 WL 2731570, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 484

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 10, 2016·No. WD 78587·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per curiam:

Appellant Kenneth Blake (“Blake”), an inmate incarcerated in Crossroads Correctional Center (“CRCC”), brought suit against a number of defendants associated with the CRCC and Missouri Department of Corrections alleging violations of the United States Constitution and Missouri Constitution for not allowing the proper observance of certain Muslim religious holidays. On appeal, Blake challenges the trial court’s orders limiting written discovery and denying his request for an appointed attorney. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(1)). A memorandum [886] explaining our decision has been provided to the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per curiam:

Appellant Kenneth Blake (“Blake”), an inmate incarcerated in Crossroads Correctional Center (“CRCC”), brought suit against a number of defendants associated with the CRCC and Missouri Department of Corrections alleging violations of the United States Constitution and Missouri Constitution for not allowing the proper observance of certain Muslim religious holidays. On appeal, Blake challenges the trial court’s orders limiting written discovery and denying his request for an appointed attorney. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(1)). A memorandum [886] explaining our decision has been provided to the parties.

Blake v. Worsham, 489 S.W.3d 885, 2016 WL 2731570, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 484 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

489 S.W.3d 885 (Blake v. Worsham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.