Blake v. Worsham

489 S.W.3d 885, 2016 WL 2731570, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 484
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 10, 2016
DocketWD 78587
StatusPublished

This text of 489 S.W.3d 885 (Blake v. Worsham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blake v. Worsham, 489 S.W.3d 885, 2016 WL 2731570, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 484 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

Per curiam:

Appellant Kenneth Blake (“Blake”), an inmate incarcerated in Crossroads Correctional Center (“CRCC”), brought suit against a number of defendants associated with the CRCC and Missouri Department of Corrections alleging violations of the United States Constitution and Missouri Constitution for not allowing the proper observance of certain Muslim religious holidays. On appeal, Blake challenges the trial court’s orders limiting written discovery and denying his request for an appointed attorney. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(1)). A memorandum [886]*886explaining our decision has been provided to the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 S.W.3d 885, 2016 WL 2731570, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-worsham-moctapp-2016.