Blake v. Vilbig

288 A.D.2d 470, 733 N.Y.S.2d 892, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11372
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 26, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 288 A.D.2d 470 (Blake v. Vilbig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blake v. Vilbig, 288 A.D.2d 470, 733 N.Y.S.2d 892, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Garvey, J.), dated August 22, 2000, which granted the father’s motion to dismiss the petition and denied, without a hearing, her petition to modify an order of the same court dated September 8, 1998, awarding physical custody of the parties’ child to the father and granted her supervised visitation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court properly denied, without a hearing, her petition to modify an existing order which granted her supervised visitation with her child (see, Milhollen v Voelpel, 270 AD2d 422). One who seeks to modify an existing order of visitation is not automatically entitled to a hearing, but must make some evidentiary showing sufficient to warrant a hearing (see, Rosenberg v Rosenberg, 261 AD2d 623; Miller v Lee, 225 AD2d 778). The mother’s allegations, even if true, would not give rise to finding of a change in circumstances warranting modification of the prior order. Ritter, J. P., H. Miller, Feuerstein and Prudenti, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fitje v. Fitje
87 A.D.3d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Mennuti v. Berry
59 A.D.3d 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Hongach v. Hongach
44 A.D.3d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Walberg v. Rudden
14 A.D.3d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Steinharter v. Steinharter
11 A.D.3d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Heuthe v. McLaren
1 A.D.2d 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 A.D.2d 470, 733 N.Y.S.2d 892, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-vilbig-nyappdiv-2001.