Blake v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blake v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

273 So. 3d 1130

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 15, 2019

DocketNo. 3D18-1776

StatusPublished

This text of 273 So. 3d 1130 (Blake v. U.S. Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blake v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 273 So. 3d 1130 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979) ; Saka v. Saka, 831 So.2d 709, 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) ("As a general rule, reviewing courts will not consider points raised for the first time on appeal.... the appellant must present a record indicating that an adequate and timely objection was interposed in the proceedings below challenging the action sought to be reviewed on appeal."); Smith Original Homes, Inc. v. Carpet King Carpets, Inc., 896 So.2d 844, 847 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ("Deliberate and contumacious disregard of the court's authority justifies application of the severe sanction of striking pleadings or entering default for noncompliance with a discovery order, as will bad faith, willful disregard or gross indifference to the court's order, or conduct which evinces deliberate callousness."); Paranzino v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A., 690 So.2d 725 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979) ; Saka v. Saka, 831 So.2d 709, 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) ("As a general rule, reviewing courts will not consider points raised for the first time on appeal.... the appellant must present a record indicating that an adequate and timely objection was interposed in the proceedings below challenging the action sought to be reviewed on appeal."); Smith Original Homes, Inc. v. Carpet King Carpets, Inc., 896 So.2d 844, 847 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ("Deliberate and contumacious disregard of the court's authority justifies application of the severe sanction of striking pleadings or entering default for noncompliance with a discovery order, as will bad faith, willful disregard or gross indifference to the court's order, or conduct which evinces deliberate callousness."); Paranzino v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A., 690 So.2d 725 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 So. 3d 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-us-bank-na-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack