Blake v. United States

249 F. Supp. 296, 17 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1492, 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8780
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Texas
DecidedNovember 13, 1964
DocketCiv. A. Nos. 5-63-68, 5-63-69
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 F. Supp. 296 (Blake v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blake v. United States, 249 F. Supp. 296, 17 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1492, 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8780 (N.D. Tex. 1964).

Opinion

DOOLEY, District Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

These actions were instituted by a partnership, Plains Electroplating and Bumper Supply, consisting of Bill Blake, James Boase and Robert Brown, and a corporation, Plains Electro Plating and Bumper Supply Company. Inasmuch as these actions involve the operation of a single, continuous business, both entities will hereinafter be referred to as taxpayer.

The operation of the taxpayer is straightening and replating automobile bumpers. Upon receiving damaged, unusable automobile bumpers, the taxpayer applies its process to such bumpers for marketing as replacement parts of an automobile. The bumpers processed by the taxpayer are automobile parts and accessories.

[297]*2973

On the average, only about twenty per cent (20%) of the exterior surface of bumpers processed by taxpayer are in a damaged condition, the remaining eighty per cent (80%) being in satisfactory condition. It is not possible to process just the damaged area, so the entire bumper is submitted to taxpayer’s process.

The operation of the taxpayer may be separated into three phases, straightening and sanding, removing or stripping the plate, and replating the bumper itself. In straightening the damaged bumpers, taxpayer uses various hand tools, such as a ball peen hammer, various-sized sledge hammers, pec hammers and a dolly. As an aid to straightening the bumpers, taxpayer uses an acetylene torch to heat the metal so it may be hammered into shape. Also, taxpayer may use one of more than a hundred contour patterns indicating the upper and lower contours of the particular bumper being processed. A swivel or hand press may also be used in the event more pressure on a given spot in the bumper is desired. As soon as the bumper has been hammered into its proper contour and checked on the pattern, the straightening operation has then been completed.

Badly mangled, twisted or mashed bumpers are not processed by taxpayer because it is uneconomical. Only those bumpers retaining their essential shape and form are processed.

At no time during the application of taxpayer’s process does a bumper lose its identity or cease to be recognizable as the same bumper, and approximately sixty per cent (60%) of the bumpers processed by taxpayer are actually identified by taxpayer through the entire process.

Upon completion of the straightening process, the bumper is then removed to another room for the sanding operation. Here again the hammer and dolly are used on the bumper. The workman also uses an electric-driven sander, which has attached to it a 50-grit abrasive disc. The power machine is used to grind the bumper to a certain smoothness that cannot be obtained by the hammer and dolly. The “grit” used on the disc will determine the coarseness (or roughness) of the finish on the bumper. The disc turns at 4,500 revolutions per minute at all times during its use in the operation. The completion of this sanding operation concludes the first phase of the taxpayer’s process, straightening and sanding, and the bumper is then ready for the removal or stripping of the plate.

The second phase of taxpayer’s process begins with the removal of the bumper to the plating room. There it is suspended in a 230-gallon tank of caustic soda (an alkaline solution) by means of copper hooks. The bumper stays in the tank for varying lengths of time, depending on the size of the bumper itself. This tank is maintained at room temperature. Upon placing the bumper in the tank, there is an electric charge that goes into the bumper itself to remove the plate. Only the chrome is removed from the bumper in this tank and it is accomplished by using only the electric charge and the caustic soda solution. After reducing the bumper to the nickel plate by this process, it is removed from the tank and rinsed with a hose to remove the caustic soda.

The bumper is then removed to another room where it is treated by power-driven wheels and power-driven belts. The wheels vary in diameter from eight inches up to eighteen inches, are from one to four inches in thickness, and are covered with an aluminum oxide, which is an abrasive grit. Depending on the recess in the particular bumper, it may [298]*298be necessary to use a 120, 180 or 220 grit wheel to smooth the bumper. The 120-grit wheel would be considered more coarse than the 220-grit wheel, and normal procedure is to start off with a rougher 120-grit wheel and proceed to a finer 220-grit wheel. There are two additional abrasives used on the wheels in this particular part of the process. One such abrasive is essentially grease placed against the wheel itself to make it faster, and the other is an abrasive compound (called emery cake) placed against the wheel while it is moving and used to facilitate polishing. A polishing belt, also covered with aluminum oxide, may also be used at this particular point in the process. After treating the bumper with the wheel or belt, the nickel and copper plating of the bumper has been removed and the bumper essentially reduced to its basic metal, steel. There is nothing removed from the bumper after this particular process.

Upon completion of this abrasive process, the bumper is taken to the plating room and placed in the cleansing tank. The bumper is suspended in this tank by means of copper hooks and will remain in the tank up to approximately 90 seconds. This tank contains an electrolytic cleaner which is called Oakite 27, also alkaline in content. The tank is heated by means of a gas heater and the temperature is maintained at approximately 180 degrees to 200 degrees Fahrenheit. Also, an electric charge (an electrolytic process) is utilized in this tank to remove the grease or smut, cleaning compounds, or polishing compounds that may be on the bumper. The bumper is then removed from the tank and scrubbed down with a scrub brush to further remove any grease or dirt that might be on the bumper. At this time, there is no copper, nickel or chrome remaining on the bumper.

The next step in the operation of the taxpayer is to place the bumper in a rinse tank (containing running clear water) for a matter of a few seconds. Then the bumper is taken to the “pickling tank” which contains an acid salt, M-629 May-tex pickling salts. This pickling tank is used to activate the metal for the plating operation. This treatment removes an oxidation or film which happens to be on the bumper and may be accomplished by placing the bumper in the tank for only a short time. Upon removing the bumper from the “pickling tank,” it is submerged for a matter of seconds in another rinse tank containing running clear water. Thereupon, the bumper is carried from this second rinse tank to the first replating material, namely, the copper tank.

The bumper is suspended by means of copper hooks in the 800-gallon copper tank. This tank contains a solution of copper resulting from the use of copper anodes which are on the side of the tank. The temperature is maintained at 140 degrees Fahrenheit by means of an electric, immersion heater. The electrical charge going into the bumper in this tank varies with the size of the bumper, though the maximum electrical charge is six volts, and the workman placing the bumper in the tank determines how much electric charge shall be given the tank. The bumper will stay in the copper tank from ten to fifteen minutes, again depending on the size of the bumper itself.

Upon completion of the copper plating, the bumper is removed and taken to another room for what the taxpayer calls “buffing” by a power-driven buff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bill Blake v. United States
355 F.2d 23 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 F. Supp. 296, 17 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1492, 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-united-states-txnd-1964.