Blake v. Southern Railway Co.
This text of 33 S.E. 396 (Blake v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
It having been adjudged in this case, at the March term 1897 (101 Ga. 217), that the plaintiff below, notwithstanding the negligence of the defendant, was not, upon the facts appearing, entitled to a recovery, and the evidence at the trial now under review, though not in all respects as full as at the first trial, making substantially the same case and showing that the plaintiff might by the exercise of ordinary care and diligence have avoided the injuries of which he complains, the judgment granting a nonsuit was right.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 S.E. 396, 108 Ga. 764, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-southern-railway-co-ga-1899.