Blake v. Ross

667 F. App'x 408
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 27, 2016
DocketNo. 13-7279
StatusPublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 408 (Blake v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blake v. Ross, 667 F. App'x 408 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

GREGORY, Chief Judge:

Having considered the Supreme Court’s decision in Ross v. Blake, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 1850, 195 L.Ed.2d 117 (2016), we hereby remand this case to the district court for further proceedings. The Supreme Court noted that the parties “lodged” new materials, review of which is generally not within our province. See United States v. Manbeck, 744 F.2d 360, 392 (4th Cir. 1984) (“It is axiomatic that it is the role of the factfinder, not the appellate court, to resolve conflicts in testimony, weigh the evidence, and judge the credibility of witnesses.”). Accordingly, on remand, the parties may augment the record so that it contains any pertinent evidence relating to whether or not the inmate remedies are “available.” See Blake, 136 S.Ct. at 1859. It will then be before the district court to address this question in the first instance.

REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ross v. Blake
578 U.S. 632 (Supreme Court, 2016)
United States v. Manbeck
744 F.2d 360 (Fourth Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-ross-ca4-2016.