Blake v. Missouri Department of Corrections
This text of 628 F. App'x 465 (Blake v. Missouri Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Missouri inmate Kenneth L. Blake appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. Upon careful consideration of Blake’s arguments for reversal, and de novo review of the record relevant to the claims he raises on appeal, see Murchison v. Rogers, 779 F.3d 882, 886-87 (8th Cir.2015) (summary judgment standard of review); Hess v. Ables, 714 F.3d 1048, 1051 n. 2 (8th Cir.2013) (abandonment of claims), we find no basis for reversal. We also find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of appointed counsel, see Phillips v. Jasper County Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (there is no constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in civil case; relevant criteria), or in the denial of class certification, see Chaffin v. Rheem Mfg. Co., 904 F.2d 1269, 1275-76 (8th Cir.1990). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
. The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
628 F. App'x 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-missouri-department-of-corrections-ca8-2016.