Blake v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided May 30, 2019·No. Civil Action No. 2019-0492·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WILLIAM R. BLAKE III, )

Petitioner ) Case No. 1:19-cv-00492-TSC )

v. )

MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH ) INCORPORATED )

and )

WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES, LLC, )

Respondents )

________________________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court having considered: 1) The Petition for an Order Confirming Arbitration Award

and the exhibits thereto, ECF No. 1, ; and 2) Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Summary

Judgment, Statement of Material Facts, and the Affidavit of John R. Snyder, ECF No. 7, the

Court concludes there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, that Petitioner has satisfied the

requirements of 9 U.S.C. § 9, and Petitioner is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Therefore, pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 9, by separate order, the court will grant Petitioner’s

motion and confirm the award dated December 1, 2018 issued in the arbitration conducted by

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Dispute Resolution entitled William Richard Blake v.

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC, FINRA-

DR Case No. 18-01896.

Date: May 30, 2019

Tanya S. Chutkan TANYA S. CHUTKAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blake v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated, (D.D.C. 2019).

Blake v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Blake v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related