Blake v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated
This text of Blake v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Blake v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________________________ WILLIAM R. BLAKE III, ) Petitioner ) Case No. 1:19-cv-00492-TSC ) v. ) MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH ) INCORPORATED ) and ) WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES, LLC, ) Respondents ) ________________________________________________)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Court having considered: 1) The Petition for an Order Confirming Arbitration Award
and the exhibits thereto, ECF No. 1, ; and 2) Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Summary
Judgment, Statement of Material Facts, and the Affidavit of John R. Snyder, ECF No. 7, the
Court concludes there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, that Petitioner has satisfied the
requirements of 9 U.S.C. § 9, and Petitioner is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Therefore, pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 9, by separate order, the court will grant Petitioner’s
motion and confirm the award dated December 1, 2018 issued in the arbitration conducted by
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Dispute Resolution entitled William Richard Blake v.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC, FINRA-
DR Case No. 18-01896.
Date: May 30, 2019
Tanya S. Chutkan TANYA S. CHUTKAN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Blake v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-merrill-lynch-pierce-fenner-smith-incorporated-dcd-2019.