Blake v. Liman

245 A.D. 723
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 A.D. 723 (Blake v. Liman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blake v. Liman, 245 A.D. 723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Appeal from order directing plaintiffs’ attorney to accept service of an answer which defendant Clifford claims was served in time, but which appellants claim was served after the time to serve the answer had expired. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and matter remitted to the Special Term for the purpose of taking testimony as to whether the summons and complaint were served on February 20, 1935, as claimed by appellants, or on March 2, 1935, as claimed by respondent, and making an order accordingly. The matter is not one that should be decided upon affidavits. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Master Navigation Co. v. Great Circle Shipping Corp.
86 Misc. 829 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D. 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-liman-nyappdiv-1935.