Blake v. Jerome

New York Supreme Court

Blake v. Jerome

14 Johns. 406

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1817

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 14 Johns. 406 (Blake v. Jerome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blake v. Jerome, 14 Johns. 406 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1817).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment must be affirmed. The evidence as to the right of property in the mare and coltimay be somewhat questionable ; but the defendant below was, at all events, guilty of a tresspass, in sending a person on the land of the plaintiff to take them away. (6 Johns* Rep. 5.) The action was, therefore, technically supported, and where the evidence as to true ownership of the property is so nearly balanced, the judgment ought not to be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment must be affirmed. The evidence as to the right of property in the mare and coltimay be somewhat questionable ; but the defendant below was, at all events, guilty of a tresspass, in sending a person on the land of the plaintiff to take them away. (6 Johns* Rep. 5.) The action was, therefore, technically supported, and where the evidence as to true ownership of the property is so nearly balanced, the judgment ought not to be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Johns. 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-jerome-nysupct-1817.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack