Blake v. Jerome
14 Johns. 406
Opinion
The judgment must be affirmed. The evidence as to the right of property in the mare and coltimay be somewhat questionable ; but the defendant below was, at all events, guilty of a tresspass, in sending a person on the land of the plaintiff to take them away. (6 Johns* Rep. 5.) The action was, therefore, technically supported, and where the evidence as to true ownership of the property is so nearly balanced, the judgment ought not to be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blake v. Jerome, 14 Johns. 406 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1817).
14 Johns. 406 (Blake v. Jerome) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Agnew v. Jones
74 Miss. 347 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1896)
Huggins Cracker & Candy Co. v. People's Insurance
41 Mo. App. 530 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1890)
Farrar v. Payne
73 Ill. 82 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1874)
Kenny v. Planer
3 Daly 131 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1869)
Newkirk v. Sabler
9 Barb. 652 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Yale v. Seely
15 Vt. 221 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1843)