Blake v. Hall

57 N.H. 373, 1876 N.H. LEXIS 103
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided August 11, 1876·Published

Opinion

Smith, J.

There is nothing in this case that shows that the defendant contracted in respect to any property held by her to her sole and separate use, or even that she held any such property upon which such a contract could operate. Whipple v. Giles, 55 N. H. 139.

Cushing, O. J., and Ladd, J., concurred.

Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blake v. Hall, 57 N.H. 373, 1876 N.H. LEXIS 103 (N.H. 1876).

57 N.H. 373 (Blake v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whipple v. Giles
55 N.H. 139 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1875)