Blake v. Gerken

City of New York Municipal Court

Blake v. Gerken

34 Misc. 830, 71 N.Y.S. 1133

DecidedMay 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Misc. 830 (Blake v. Gerken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blake v. Gerken, 34 Misc. 830, 71 N.Y.S. 1133 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the trial justice erred in his dismissal of the complaint. The undisputed evidence was that work was done and materials furnished, for which plaintiffs were entitled to at least nominal compensation. This judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with .costs to appellants to abide event of action.

Present: Eitzsimows, Oh. J., Hascall and O’Dwyer, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We think the trial justice erred in his dismissal of the complaint. The undisputed evidence was that work was done and materials furnished, for which plaintiffs were entitled to at least nominal compensation. This judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with .costs to appellants to abide event of action.

Present: Eitzsimows, Oh. J., Hascall and O’Dwyer, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Misc. 830, 71 N.Y.S. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-gerken-nynyccityct-1901.