Blake v. Employment Dept.
Opinion
714 December 20, 2023 No. 677
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Danette M. BLAKE,
Petitioner,
v.
EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and Legacy Meridian Park Hospital, Respondents.
Employment Appeals Board 2022EAB0017; A177972
Argued and submitted April 19, 2023. Ray D. Hacke argued the cause for petitioner. Also on the briefs was Pacific Justice Institute.
Michael A. Casper, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Employment Department. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.
Sophie Shaddy-Farnsworth argued the cause for respondent Legacy Meridian Park Hospital. Also on the brief were Brenda K. Baumgart, Crystal S. Chase, and Stoel Rives LLP.
Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.
PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded. Lavelle-Hayden v. Employment Dept., 326 Or App 490, 533 P3d 75 (2023).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
329 Or. App. 714 (Blake v. Employment Dept.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.