Blake v. Darling
116 Mass. 300, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 87
Opinion
The value of goods replevied need not be alleged in the writ. The jurisdiction depends upon the actual value as proved at the trial, not upon the plaintiff’s allegation or the appraisers’ certificate. King v. Dewey, 11 Cush. 218. Pomeroy v. Trimper, 8 Allen, 398. Davenport v. Burke, 9 Allen, 116. Leonard v. Hannon, 105 Mass. 113. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blake v. Darling, 116 Mass. 300, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 87 (Mass. 1874).
116 Mass. 300 (Blake v. Darling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Trujillo v. Tucker
171 P. 788 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1918)
Maguire v. Pan-American Amusement Co.
91 N.E. 135 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Littlefield v. Maine Central Railroad
71 A. 657 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1908)
Octo v. Teahan
133 Mass. 430 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1882)