Blake v. Czysz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blake v. Czysz

283 A.D.2d 943, 723 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4582

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 283 A.D.2d 943 (Blake v. Czysz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blake v. Czysz, 283 A.D.2d 943, 723 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in precluding Terry R. Blake (plaintiff) or his representative from audiotaping or otherwise recording the independent medical examination of plaintiff (see, Parsons v Hytech Tool & Die, 241 AD2d 936, 937; Savarese v Yonkers Motors Corp., 205 AD2d 463, 463-464). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, McCarthy, J. — Discovery.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hayes, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in precluding Terry R. Blake (plaintiff) or his representative from audiotaping or otherwise recording the independent medical examination of plaintiff (see, Parsons v Hytech Tool & Die, 241 AD2d 936, 937; Savarese v Yonkers Motors Corp., 205 AD2d 463, 463-464). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, McCarthy, J. — Discovery.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hayes, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 943, 723 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-czysz-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack