Blake v. Coombe

226 A.D.2d 1123, 642 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5646

Opinion

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: We reject the argument of petitioner that he was denied the right to call a witness at the disciplinary hearing. The record does not establish that petitioner requested the testimony of that witness at the disciplinary hearing (see, Matter of Gomez v Coughlin, 140 AD2d 902, 904).

The determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [i]), prohibiting possession of a weapon by an inmate, is supported by substantial evidence. Petitioner’s denial of the charge raised an issue of credibility, which the Hearing Officer resolved against petitioner (see, Matter of Perez v Wilmot, 67 NY2d 615, 617). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present—Pine, J. P., Wesley, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blake v. Coombe, 226 A.D.2d 1123, 642 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

226 A.D.2d 1123 (Blake v. Coombe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perez v. Wilmot
490 N.E.2d 526 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Gomez v. Coughlin
140 A.D.2d 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)