Blake v. Commissioner
This text of 1981 T.C. Memo. 41 (Blake v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
GOFFE,
(1) whether petitioner (a professional corporation) is entitled to deduct rentals paid for the use of a trailer home to entertain guests; and
(2) whether the late filing penalty was properly imposed.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Some of the facts have been stipulated. The stipulation of facts, together with the exhibits attached thereto, are incorporated herein by this reference.
The petitioner was a professional corporation doing business in Mesa, Arizona, at the time*703 its petition herein was filed. Petitioner filed a U.S. Corporation income tax return for its fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, on December 27, 1976.
During its fiscal year ended June 30, 1976, petitioner paid to Stanley I. Blake, M.D. (Dr. Blake) $ 3,600 in rentals for the use of a trailer home owned by Dr. Blake in a resort area of Arizona. Dr. Blake was petitioner's president and medical officer. Dr. Blake claimed that the trailer was used to entertain physicians who referred cases to him and hospital personnel (such as nurses and technicians) who worked with him. To substantiate the deduction, Dr. Blake submitted what he claimed was a summary of a "log" he kept in his office. On the summary were listed dates and names of various people. The only portion of the summary pertinent to the fiscal year before us was as follows:
7/17/75 Mr. & Mrs. Longs' guests
On its Federal income tax return for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1976, petitioner deducted the rentals it paid for the trailer. Respondent disallowed the deduction in full.
OPINION
Section 274 as in effect for the taxable year before us provided:
SEC. 274. *704 DISALLOWANCE OF CERTAIN ENTERTAINMENT, ETC., EXPENSES.
(a) ENTERTAINMENT, AMUSEMENT, OR RECREATION.--
(1) IN GENERAL.--No deduction otherwise allowable under this chapter shall be allowed for any item--
(A) ACTIVITY.--With respect to an activity which is of a type generally considered to constitute entertainment, amusement, or recreation, unless the taxpayer establishes that the item was directly related to, or, in the case of an item directly preceding or following a substantial and bona fide business discussion (including business meetings at a convention or otherwise), that such item was associated with, the active conduct of the taxpayer's trade or business, or
(B) FACILITY.--With respect to a facility used in connection with an activity referred to in subparagraph (A), unless the taxpayer establishes that the facility was used primarily for the furtherance of the taxpayer's trade or business and that the item was directly related to the active conduct of such trade or business,
and such deduction shall in no event exceed the portion of such item directly related to, or, in the case of an item described in subparagraph (A) directly preceding or following a substantial*705 and bona fide business discussion (including business meetings at a convention or otherwise), the portion of such item associated with, the active conduct of the taxpayer's taxpayer's trade or business.
(d) SUBSTANTIATION REQUIRED.--No deduction shall be allowed--
(1) under section 162 or 212 for any traveling expense (including meals and lodging while away from home),
(2) for any time with respect to an activity which is of a type generally considered to constitute entertainment, amusement, or recreation, or with respect to a facility used in connection with such activity, or
(3) for any expense for gifts,
unless the taxpayer substantiates by adequate records or by sufficient evidence corroborating his own statement (A) the amount of such expense or other item, (B) the time and place of the travel, entertainment, amusement, recreation, or use of the facility, or the date and description of the gift, (C) the business purpose of the expense or other item, and (D) the business relationship to the taxpayer of persons entertained, using the facility, or receiving the gift. The Secretary may by regulations provide that some or all of the requirements of the preceding sentence*706 shall not apply in the case of an expense which does not exceed an amount prescribed pursuant to such regulations.
Petitioner must fail on this issue because it has not met the substantiation requirements of section 274(d). The actual "log" was not produced which fact raises some doubt concerning its existence. Furthermore, even if we assume that the summary was actually taken from and accurately reflected the contents of the log, there was only one entry for the fiscal year before us and it fails to make any mention of either the business purpose of the entertainment of the Longs or of their business relationship to the petitioner. Petitioner has not met its burden of proving respondent's determination to be in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1981 T.C. Memo. 41, 41 T.C.M. 802, 1981 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-commissioner-tax-1981.