Blake v. Clyde Porcelain Steel Corp.

7 F.R.D. 768, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1479
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedAugust 24, 1944
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 7 F.R.D. 768 (Blake v. Clyde Porcelain Steel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blake v. Clyde Porcelain Steel Corp., 7 F.R.D. 768, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1479 (S.D.N.Y. 1944).

Opinion

KNOX, District Judge.

This is a motion to amend the complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 15(a), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

[769]*769The original complaint was framed to the issue of moneys due but not paid to the plaintiff under a contract of employment. The plaintiff, in 1942, entered into a contract with defendants to use his abilities to bring them customers from a specified territory in the northeastern portion of the United States. His pay was to be a commission of three percent of the amount of contracts or orders placed by concerns solicited by plaintiff. Most of the corporations so placing orders were war plants, and it seems that some of such orders were cancelled by governmental action.

Plaintiff is now moving to amend his complaint to state a cause of action in quantum meruit, and thus enable him to receive compensation for such work as proved of value to defendants. The full terms of the contract are not now before the Court and it may be that they are such as to permit plaintiff to recover on a quantum meruit basis.

Rule IS (a) states that “leave” to amend “shall be freely given when justice so requires”, and if plaintiff has a valid cause of action upon any theory, he should be afforded opportunity to assert it.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hillyard v. Smither & Mayton, Inc.
76 A.2d 166 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1950)
Popovitch v. Kasperlik
76 F. Supp. 233 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 F.R.D. 768, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-clyde-porcelain-steel-corp-nysd-1944.