Blake v. . Clausen
53 N.E. 1129, 158 N.Y. 727, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 834
Opinion
We think the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. There was no valid renewal of the note in question on the 28th day of October, 1887. (Olmstead v. Latimer, 158 N. Y. 313, and authorities there cited.)
Upon the other questions involved we call attention to, the cases of Chapman v. Lynch (156 N. Y. 551) and Close v. Potter (155 N. Y. 145, 156).
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blake v. . Clausen, 53 N.E. 1129, 158 N.Y. 727, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 834 (N.Y. 1899).
53 N.E. 1129 (Blake v. . Clausen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Close v. . Potter
49 N.E. 686 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
Olmstead v. . Latimer
53 N.E. 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Chapman v. . Lynch
51 N.E. 275 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)