Blake v. . Clausen

New York Court of Appeals

Blake v. . Clausen

53 N.E. 1129, 158 N.Y. 727, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 834

DecidedMarch 24, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 53 N.E. 1129 (Blake v. . Clausen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blake v. . Clausen, 53 N.E. 1129, 158 N.Y. 727, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 834 (N.Y. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. There was no valid renewal of the note in question on the 28th day of October, 1887. (Olmstead v. Latimer, 158 N. Y. 313, and authorities there cited.)

Upon the other questions involved we call attention to, the cases of Chapman v. Lynch (156 N. Y. 551) and Close v. Potter (155 N. Y. 145, 156).

All concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI