Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Blake v. City of Pleasantville

Blake v. City of Pleasantville

98 A. 1084, 89 N.J.L. 358, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 324
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Blake v. City of Pleasantville. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 N.J.L. 426 →
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 19, 1916·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice ICalisch in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Terhune, Heppen-HEIMER, JJ. 8.

For reversal—Black, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 3.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blake v. City of Pleasantville, 98 A. 1084, 89 N.J.L. 358, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 324 (N.J. 1916).

98 A. 1084 (Blake v. City of Pleasantville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.