Blake v. . Case
This text of 112 S.E. 927 (Blake v. . Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The controversy on trial narrowed itself principally to 'questions relating to adverse possession under color of title. After a careful reading of the record, we are convinced that the case has been tried in substantial conformity with the law as bearing on the subject, .-and we have found no sufficient reason for disturbing the result below. *682 Upon the question of adverse possession, his Honor followed closely the decisions of this Court in the cases of Alexander v. Cedar Works, 171 N. C., 137, and Locklear v. Savage, 159 N. C., 236.
We have found no reversible or prejudicial error.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 S.E. 927, 183 N.C. 681, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-case-nc-1922.