Blake v. Burger King Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Blake v. Burger King Corp.

443 F. App'x 849

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 22, 2011·No. No. 11-1527·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Blake appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blake v. Burger King Corp., No. 3:10-cv-00675-HEH, 2011 WL 1480049 (E.D.Va. Apr. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Blake appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blake v. Burger King Corp., No. 3:10-cv-00675-HEH, 2011 WL 1480049 (E.D.Va. Apr. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Blake v. Burger King Corp., 443 F. App'x 849 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

443 F. App'x 849 (Blake v. Burger King Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.