Blake v. Baker

115 Mass. 188, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 185
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided June 18, 1874·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The words of the covenant in this case are less comprehensive than in the case of Curtis v. Pierce, ante, 186. But it was made while statutes were in force authorizing assess» ments for betterments similar to that here sought to be recovered. It must therefore be held to include assessments of this character, levied on the premises during the term. Codman v. Johnson, 104 Mass. 491. New York v. Cashman, 10 Johns. 96. Astor v. Miller, 2 Paige, 68.

The orders laying out the street and assessing the betterment were passed during the term of the lease. The order of September, 1872, did not lay a new assessment, but merely made a deduction from that formerly laid. For the balance of that assessment, therefore, The plaintiffs must have judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blake v. Baker, 115 Mass. 188, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 185 (Mass. 1874).

115 Mass. 188 (Blake v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Borgman v. Spellmire
4 Ohio N.P. 416 (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County, 1897)
Smith v. Abington Savings Bank
42 N.E. 1133 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
Cassady v. Hammer
62 Iowa 359 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1883)
Proprietors of Swan Point Cemetery v. Tripp
14 R.I. 199 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1883)
Holt v. City Council
127 Mass. 408 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1879)
Beals v. Providence Rubber Company
11 R.I. 381 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1876)
Simonds v. Turner
120 Mass. 328 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1876)