Blake v. . Askew

76 N.C. 325
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1877·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Reads, J.

If feigned issues were ever entertained in this State, they are abolished by the Constitution, Art. 4, § 1.

This is manifest by a feigned issue based upon a wager to test the validity of certain bonds said to have been issued *327 b>y the State alleged in the pleadings to amount to $5,000, ■000:

Besides the objection that it is a feigned issue which is forbidden by the Constitution, it is an attempted fraud upon 'the State, by putting her interests in jeopardy and affecting her credit, in a controvery to which she is not a party.

The action is “ not fit to be entertained ” and is therefore ■dismissed.

Each party will pay his own costs.

Per Curiam. Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blake v. . Askew, 76 N.C. 325 (N.C. 1877).

76 N.C. 325 (Blake v. . Askew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Comm. to Elect Dan Forest v. Emps. Pol. Action Comm.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2021
Board of Health v. Board of Commissioners
16 S.E.2d 677 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
North Carolina Automotive Trade Ass'n v. Doughton
135 S.E. 131 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Burton v. Durham Realty & Insurance
125 S.E. 3 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.
179 N.W. 350 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)
Hale v. Berg
83 N.E. 357 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1908)
Simpson v. Lister
39 N.J. Eq. 595 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1885)