Blake v. . Askew

76 N.C. 325
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 76 N.C. 325 (Blake v. . Askew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blake v. . Askew, 76 N.C. 325 (N.C. 1877).

Opinion

Reads, J.

If feigned issues were ever entertained in this State, they are abolished by the Constitution, Art. 4, § 1.

This is manifest by a feigned issue based upon a wager to test the validity of certain bonds said to have been issued *327 b>y the State alleged in the pleadings to amount to $5,000, ■000:

Besides the objection that it is a feigned issue which is forbidden by the Constitution, it is an attempted fraud upon 'the State, by putting her interests in jeopardy and affecting her credit, in a controvery to which she is not a party.

The action is “ not fit to be entertained ” and is therefore ■dismissed.

Each party will pay his own costs.

Per Curiam. Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Comm. to Elect Dan Forest v. Emps. Pol. Action Comm.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2021
Board of Health v. Board of Commissioners
16 S.E.2d 677 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
North Carolina Automotive Trade Ass'n v. Doughton
135 S.E. 131 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Burton v. Durham Realty & Insurance
125 S.E. 3 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.
179 N.W. 350 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)
Hale v. Berg
83 N.E. 357 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1908)
Simpson v. Lister
39 N.J. Eq. 595 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 N.C. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-askew-nc-1877.