Blake Scott Taylor v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 7, 2007·No. 01-05-00953-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 7, 2007





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-05-00953-CR

____________



BLAKE SCOTT TAYLOR, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 997975



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Blake Scott Taylor, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of aggravated robbery, and after a pre-sentence investigation hearing, the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for 10 years. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We affirm.

Appellant's counsel on appeal has filed a brief stating that the record presents no reversible error, that the appeal is without merit and is frivolous, and that the appeal must be dismissed or affirmed. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, (1967). The brief meets the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and detailing why there are no arguable grounds for reversal. Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; see also High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 810 (Tex. Crim. App.1978).

Counsel represents that he has served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel also advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief.

Having reviewed the record and counsel's brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit and that there is no reversible error. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27(Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. (1)

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Hanks.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

1.

Counsel has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal and also to inform appellant that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blake Scott Taylor v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Blake Scott Taylor v. State (Blake Scott Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Stafford v. State
813 S.W.2d 503 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)