Blake Lynch v. American Express
Opinion
WO
Blake Lynch, No. CV-25-04671-PHX-KML
Plaintiff, ORDER
v.
American Express,
Defendant. Plaintiff Blake Lynch filed a proof of service indicating that Lynch sent a “copy of the Summons and Complaint” to defendant via certified mail. (Doc. 9 at 1.) Lynch later applied for entry of default and defendant’s default was entered. (Docs. 14, 15.) According to Rule 4(c), “[a]ny person who is at least 18 years old and not a party may serve a summons and complaint.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2) (emphasis added); see also Constien v. United States, 628 F.3d 1207, 1217 (10th Cir. 2010) (service improper because mailings were done by plaintiff herself, “not by a nonparty, as required by Rule 4(c)”). Because it appears Lynch personally mailed the summons and complaint, the service reflected on the docket is insufficient. The default is vacated and Lynch must file proof of proper service. / / / / 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the Entry of Default (Doc. 15) is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED no later than March 27, 2026, plaintiff shall file a proof of service that complies with all applicable rules and laws. Dated this 4th day of February, 2026.
Honorable Krissa M. Lanham United States District Judge
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blake Lynch v. American Express (Blake Lynch v. American Express) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.