BLAKE, JANE RENNIE v. BLAKE, KENNETH DARCY
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
450 CA 10-01699 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.
JANE RENNIE BLAKE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KENNETH DARCY BLAKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
WATSON, BENNETT, COLLIGAN & SCHECHTER LLP, BUFFALO (KRISTIN L. ARCURI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, WILLIAMSVILLE (DENIS A. SCINTA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F.
O’Donnell, J.), entered July 15, 2010 in a divorce action. The order denied the quantum meruit application of defendant’s attorney for counsel fees.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same Memorandum as in Blake v Blake ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Apr. 29, 2011]).
Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
BLAKE, JANE RENNIE v. BLAKE, KENNETH DARCY (BLAKE, JANE RENNIE v. BLAKE, KENNETH DARCY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.