Blake Fairchild v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Blake Fairchild v. State

DecidedSeptember 18, 2020

Docket03-20-00354-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Blake Fairchild v. State (Blake Fairchild v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blake Fairchild v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 18, 2020

NO. 03-20-00354-CR

Blake Fairchild, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order denying appellant’s motion for bond reduction entered by the

trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this

appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay

all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00355-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order denying appellant’s motion for bond reduction entered by the

trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this

appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay

all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00356-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order denying appellant’s motion for bond reduction entered by the

trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this

appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay

all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00357-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order denying appellant’s motion for bond reduction entered by the

trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this

appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay

all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 18, 2020

NO. 03-20-00354-CR

Blake Fairchild, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order denying appellant’s motion for bond reduction entered by the

trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this

appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay

all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00355-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order denying appellant’s motion for bond reduction entered by the

trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this

appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay

all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00356-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order denying appellant’s motion for bond reduction entered by the

trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this

appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay

all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00357-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order denying appellant’s motion for bond reduction entered by the

trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this

appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay

all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Blake Fairchild v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-fairchild-v-state-texapp-2020.