Blake Anthony Monakino v. State

Opinion

CkH k° bV-W*oo3fa( - c^

rn^kta^^a^l-'M-^^ I'finV (.ouc-v of ftp^U PILED in -tSTCOURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON. TEXAS

>x %. CH»?TOPHEJ CHRffiTnpucD .

(L'lSgy V- (WIwaa)-^ l^ lai Vu SW Aa3v\\ shauo o^ -fbr Vhg (VjjiiZ coaH d&\e\s S * *HW sVm> jky (if, sim gcA ih lAaj 3 uxi

S^ , ^/i/Kg g| PS1 Uk.D VKf.4. id/1 h±5hu All j(K| L^d4 4° QiM^/U. 6] J HbM Da5 &£jfc£JMJ ff x tog4/^J gMtf •"fiy-^rw -fc -fit? Alu? qfpt«l,. ^g iI

i-WV-— # X aSlftvl W -for q fcony) wJu(M<* f\i)fhoroJj jftfW S—On/) S^m? heater 4^ c7i - Jo) So s/(\q? sy_e ^W ^ -He (km ^gL -x Hi Aq £\W \V ^yq & , yxi\ ^y ^Ite-kims V> -^y\A o>OV she ^S iwy Q-Wftfjn jfoj u>df-hfAO X Wa5 oa fl^4 a^ Skf

iV W^\i^ o^ il^'s fv\i£kb ^ul Ag £^il miSyJa i X W/'hl fl1/? foftnVvS U>*Vh no //<>or>S/^ •> ^ siap 4ii^ =^\a V^W mWrfl- b a u, C4SP *=^ %' 3o| Far) n\n :'UUj£4£0&S39