Blake 336340 v. Thornell
This text of Blake 336340 v. Thornell (Blake 336340 v. Thornell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 Rayquan Emil Blake, No. CV-25-00495-PHX-KML
10 Petitioner, ORDER
11 v.
12 Ryan Thornell, et al.,
13 Respondents. 14 15 Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) 16 recommending the denial of petitioner Rayquan Emil Blake’s petition for writ of habeas 17 corpus. (Doc. 13.) No objections were filed and the R&R is adopted in full. See Schmidt v. 18 Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“[D]istrict courts are not required 19 to conduct any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”). 20 IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is ADOPTED and 21 the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH 22 PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and close this case. 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a certificate □□ of appealability are DENIED because dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain 3 || procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the ruling debatable. 4 Dated this 28th day of August, 2025. 5
WW plo MM. LAA Honorable Krissa M. Lanham 8 United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
_2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Blake 336340 v. Thornell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-336340-v-thornell-azd-2025.