Blaiser v. New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad
17 N.Y. St. Rep. 145
Opinion
We are of opinion that contributory negligence could not, as matter of law, be asserted of the plaintiff’s conduct upon the facts disclosed by the evidence. The nonsuit was therefore improper, and the case should have been submitted to the jury.
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.
All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blaiser v. New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad, 17 N.Y. St. Rep. 145 (N.Y. 1888).
17 N.Y. St. Rep. 145 (Blaiser v. New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.