Blaisdell v. Sheafe

5 N.H. 201
Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided May 15, 1830·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the court.

It is settled, that an execution remains in force on the return day, so long as the court to which it is returnable, continues in session that day, and no longer, 1 Salk. 321, Perkins v. Woolaston; 6 Mod. 130, S. C. ; 12 Mass. Rep. 434, Stevens v. Bigelow; 1 N. H. Rep. 359; Cro. Eliz. 701 ; 6 Mass. Rep. 20, Prescott v. Wright.

If the execution be delivered to an officer on the return day, at any time before the court adjourns to a future day, a return of non est inventus by such officer, will be sufficient to charge the endorser of a writ. But if the execution be not delivered to an officer, until after such an adjournment on the return day, the execution must he considered as no longer in force when so delivered, and the return will be irregular.

In this case, the execution was not delivered 1o the officer in season, and there must be

Judgment for the defendant

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blaisdell v. Sheafe, 5 N.H. 201 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1830).

5 N.H. 201 (Blaisdell v. Sheafe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rangeley v. Goodwin
18 N.H. 217 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1846)