Blaisdell v. Puffer

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Blaisdell v. Puffer

3 F. Cas. 584, 4 Ban. & A. 500

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

DecidedSeptember 15, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 3 F. Cas. 584 (Blaisdell v. Puffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blaisdell v. Puffer, 3 F. Cas. 584, 4 Ban. & A. 500 (circtdma 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

LOWELL, Circuit Judge.

As to the validity of the patent, I refer to my remarks in the case against Dows. [Blaisdell v. Dows, Case No. 1,489.]

The soda pipe or apparatus, which is exhibited as having been bought of the defendant, appears to me to infringe the fourth claim. If it be true, as was suggested at the argument, that the contraction in the chamber is unnecessary, then the defendant can easily change the form of the chamber and escape the patent; but his apparatus, as it now stands, seems to have a chamber like what was decided to be the fourth claim of the patent, and! to be valid.

Temporary injunction ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LOWELL, Circuit Judge.

As to the validity of the patent, I refer to my remarks in the case against Dows. [Blaisdell v. Dows, Case No. 1,489.]

The soda pipe or apparatus, which is exhibited as having been bought of the defendant, appears to me to infringe the fourth claim. If it be true, as was suggested at the argument, that the contraction in the chamber is unnecessary, then the defendant can easily change the form of the chamber and escape the patent; but his apparatus, as it now stands, seems to have a chamber like what was decided to be the fourth claim of the patent, and! to be valid.

Temporary injunction ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 F. Cas. 584, 4 Ban. & A. 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blaisdell-v-puffer-circtdma-1879.