Blaisdell v. Lewis
32 Me. 515
This text of 32 Me. 515 (Blaisdell v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Blaisdell v. Lewis, 32 Me. 515 (Me. 1851).
Opinion
orally.—An infirmity in this contract is, that it fixed no time during which the plaintiff’s services'should be rendered to the defendant. Suppose the plaintiff had gone to Hallowell, and tendered his services, there was nothing to prevent the defendant from discharging him at the end. of a single day. In such a contract there is no value.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rowell v. Jones & Vining, Inc.
524 A.2d 1208 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1987)
Greene v. Union Mutual Life Insurance
635 F. Supp. 1437 (D. Maine, 1986)
Larrabee v. Penobscot Frozen Foods, Inc.
486 A.2d 97 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1984)
Terrio v. Millinocket Community Hospital
379 A.2d 135 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1977)
Russell & Axon v. Handshoe
176 So. 2d 909 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Phillips v. Litwin
7 Fla. Supp. 155 (Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, 1955)
Wynne v. Ludman Corporation
79 So. 2d 690 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
W., B. A.R.R. Co. v. Moss
96 A. 273 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1915)
Joliet Bottling Co. v. Joliet Citizens Brewing Co.
164 Ill. App. 490 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1911)
Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. Willett
43 Fla. 311 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1901)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 Me. 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blaisdell-v-lewis-me-1851.