Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n

249 N.W. 893, 189 Minn. 448, 1933 Minn. LEXIS 807
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided July 27, 1933·No. No. 29,711.·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered upon the finding of fact and conclusions of law. The case was here on an appeal by the plaintiffs, or petitioners, from the order denying a new trial, wherein the decision was filed on July 7, 1933. 189 Minn. 422, 249 N. W. 334. This appeal attacks L. 1933, p. 514, c. 339, as violation of the same provisions of the constitution of the United States and of the constitution of this state as in the previous appeal, the parties having submitted the case on the same briefs.

We are of the opinion that the decision in the first appeal rules this appeal, and on the authority thereof the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n, 249 N.W. 893, 189 Minn. 448, 1933 Minn. LEXIS 807 (Mich. 1933).

249 N.W. 893 (Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ACA International v. Maura Healey
D. Massachusetts, 2020
Carnel v. Travelers Insurance Co.
402 N.W.2d 190 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1987)
In Re Kazas
70 P.2d 962 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
J. C. Penney Co. v. Diefendorf
32 P.2d 784 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1934)
Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell
290 U.S. 398 (Supreme Court, 1934)