Blaisdell v. Bickum

1 N.E. 281, 139 Mass. 250, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 76
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 8, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 1 N.E. 281 (Blaisdell v. Bickum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blaisdell v. Bickum, 1 N.E. 281, 139 Mass. 250, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 76 (Mass. 1885).

Opinion

W. Allen, J.

The court properly ruled that, if Rowena Mack was the daughter of the plaintiff’s mother’s sister, the marriage between her and the plaintiff was null and void. It was made so by the statute of New Hampshire, where the marriage was contracted.

The evidence offered to prove the death of Quimby should have been excluded. It was evidence of a report in the community, not shown to have been accepted by, or known to, the family of Quimby, of the place and manner of his recent death This does not come within any exception which allows declarations of deceased members of a family, or reputation in the family, to be received as evidence of facts relating to pedigree, but under the general rule that hearsay evidence and common rumor are incompetent to prove particular facts.

Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Dutney
348 N.E.2d 812 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1976)
Rhodes v. Rhodes
96 F.2d 715 (D.C. Circuit, 1938)
Lariviere v. Lariviere
147 A. 700 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1929)
Root v. MacDonald
157 N.E. 684 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1927)
Arado v. Arado
117 N.E. 816 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1917)
Kapigian v. Der Minassian
99 N.E. 264 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)
Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. King
181 F. 913 (Ninth Circuit, 1910)
Welch v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad
64 N.E. 695 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
In re Hurlburt's Estate
68 Vt. 366 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1895)
Hayes v. Rollins
44 A. 176 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1894)
Williams v. State
12 S.E. 743 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.E. 281, 139 Mass. 250, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blaisdell-v-bickum-mass-1885.