Blais v. New England Trading Corp
This text of Blais v. New England Trading Corp (Blais v. New England Trading Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE Opie boty SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss ae ss CIVIL ACTION ese’ DOCKET NO. CV-00-666
FRITO BLAIS d/b/a JODIA FASHIONS,
Plaintiff
v. JUDGMENT
NEW ENGLAND TRADING CORP. and MICHAEL REIS,
Defendants
The plaintiff entered a contract with the defendant New England Trading Corp. (NETC) through its president and employee, defendant Michael Reis, to sell garments to Bermo Enterprises. See Pl.’s Ex. 1. The defendant would receive a commission on each garment sold. After the invoice was prepared by the plaintiff, defendant Reis stamped the invoice as payable to the defendant NETC. See PL’s Exs. 2, 3. The plaintiff did not give the defendants permission to make the invoice payable to the defendant NETC. The plaintiff expected that the defendant NETC would receive the check from Bermo and turn the check over to the plaintiff. The plaintiff would then pay the defendant NETC its commission. Defendant Reis recalled that the defendant NETC was suppose to collect the money and pay the proceeds, less defendant NETC’s commission, to the plaintiff. The court finds credible the plaintiff's testimony of the parties’ history and of the expected procedure
regarding payment. The invoice was paid by Bermo to the defendant NETC. Michael Reis originally told the plaintiff that defendant NETC had never received any money from Bermo. After documenting that Bermo had paid the invoice and defendant Reis had signed for the UPS delivery, defendant Reis then said he needed a week to pay the plaintiff. Mr. Reis later said that he did not have the money available. The plaintiff has never received any money from the sale to Bermo.
The parties stipulated that the defendant NETC owes the plaintiff $21,700.00. The court concludes that defendant Reis is liable to the plaintiff for this amount
based on his fraudulent conduct. See Johnson v. Exclusive Properties Unlimited,
1998 ME 244, J 6, 720 A.2d 568, 571; Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Moore, 663 A.2d 30, 33
n.4 (Me. 1995); Grover v. Minette-Mills, Inc., 638 A.2d 712, 716 (Me. 1994). The entry is
Judgment is entered on Counts I and II of the Plaintiff's Complaint in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant New England Trading Corp. and Defendant Michael Reis, jointly and severally, in the amount of $21,700.00 plus interest and costs. Judgment is entered on Count II of the Plaintiff's Complaint in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiff.
Date: November 20, 2001
stice, Superior Court Date Filed
Action CONTRACT
FRITO BLAISE DBA JOSIA FASHION
Plaintiff's Attorney
JUSTIN D. LEBLANC ESQ 774-9000 PO BOX 7320, PORTLAND ME 04112
Date of Entry 2000 . Received 11-06-00:
Docket No. CV 00-666
NEW ENGLAND TRADING CORPORATION MICHAEL REIS
Defendant's Attomey
FREDERICK GREENE III ESQ. (BOTH) PO BOX 7490 PORTLAND ME 04112
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Blais v. New England Trading Corp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blais-v-new-england-trading-corp-mesuperct-2001.