Blais v. Biagi
This text of 193 N.E.2d 699 (Blais v. Biagi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Exceptions overruled. The plaintiff, while a business invitee of a tenant of the defendant landlord, was injured when he stepped into an unguarded elevator shaft at the end of a common hallway. The plaintiff excepted to rulings by the judge that there was no evidence (1) upon which a finding could be made that the defendant violated a duty owed to the plaintiff, and (2) to show a difference in the condition of the defendant’s premises from the date of the letting to that of the injury. If correct, the ruling of the judge on (1) disposes of the plaintiff’s claim. There was evidence to show that the elevator gate was not in a position to guard the shaft when the plaintiff sustained his injury. The record is barren, however, of evidence indi-[767]*767eating why the gate was not in place, or whether sufficient time had elapsed before the plaintiff’s injury to enable the defendant to discover and remedy the condition. McAvey v. Albany Realty Co. 328 Mass. 310, 31A-315. There is no error in the judge’s rulings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 N.E.2d 699, 346 Mass. 766, 1963 Mass. LEXIS 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blais-v-biagi-mass-1963.