Blair v. Vierling

Indiana Supreme Court

Blair v. Vierling

33 Ind. 269

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1870

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 Ind. 269 (Blair v. Vierling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blair v. Vierling, 33 Ind. 269 (Ind. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

Gregory, C. J.

The appeal in this case must be dismissed.

In The State v. Vierling, at this term, ante, p. 99, it was held that the change of venue was properly granted from the Gibson to the Daviess Circuit Court.

This was a proceeding commenced before the commissioners of Gibson county, to obtain a license under the temperance act of 1859, to retail intoxicating liquors by a less quantity than a quart at a time. By the act of March 17th, 1861, the judgment of the circuit court, in such cases, is final, and without appeal therefrom. Acts 1861, p. 148, sec. 2.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Frazer, J., was absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gregory, C. J.

The appeal in this case must be dismissed.

In The State v. Vierling, at this term, ante, p. 99, it was held that the change of venue was properly granted from the Gibson to the Daviess Circuit Court.

This was a proceeding commenced before the commissioners of Gibson county, to obtain a license under the temperance act of 1859, to retail intoxicating liquors by a less quantity than a quart at a time. By the act of March 17th, 1861, the judgment of the circuit court, in such cases, is final, and without appeal therefrom. Acts 1861, p. 148, sec. 2.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Frazer, J., was absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Ind. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blair-v-vierling-ind-1870.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack