Blair v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Blair v. State

255 S.W.3d 530, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 822, 2008 WL 2417302

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 17, 2008

DocketED 90132

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 255 S.W.3d 530 (Blair v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blair v. State, 255 S.W.3d 530, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 822, 2008 WL 2417302 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Glen Blair appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, the Honorable Julian L. Bush presiding. A jury convicted Blair of four counts of first degree statutory sodomy § 566.062 RSMo, one count of first degree child molestation § 566.067 RSMo, and one count of sexual misconduct involving a child § 566.088 RSMo. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent sentences of twenty years for each count of statutory sodomy, ten years for child molestation, and three years for sexual misconduct involving a child. This court affirmed, State v. Blair, 175 S.W.3d 197 (Mo.App. E.D. 2005). Blair filed a timely motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15, which the motion court denied.

Blair raises one claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. He argues his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to elicit evidence of the victim’s history of disruption in school. Blair claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for relief without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Glen Blair appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, the Honorable Julian L. Bush presiding. A jury convicted Blair of four counts of first degree statutory sodomy § 566.062 RSMo, one count of first degree child molestation § 566.067 RSMo, and one count of sexual misconduct involving a child § 566.088 RSMo. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent sentences of twenty years for each count of statutory sodomy, ten years for child molestation, and three years for sexual misconduct involving a child. This court affirmed, State v. Blair, 175 S.W.3d 197 (Mo.App. E.D. 2005). Blair filed a timely motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15, which the motion court denied.

Blair raises one claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. He argues his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to elicit evidence of the victim’s history of disruption in school. Blair claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for relief without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 S.W.3d 530, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 822, 2008 WL 2417302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blair-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack