Blair v. State

549 So. 2d 114, 1988 WL 134650
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 10, 1988·No. 87-1433·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

By denying the petition in this case, we should not be understood to approve the application of the enhancement provisions of Ala. Code 1975, § 20-2-76, to a case where the prior conviction of the defendant was other than in a drug case under the Alabama Uniform Controlled Substances Act, § 20-2-1 et seq.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blair v. State, 549 So. 2d 114, 1988 WL 134650 (Ala. 1988).

549 So. 2d 114 (Blair v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parish v. State
660 So. 2d 227 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)
Nichols v. State
624 So. 2d 1328 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Ex Parte Jackson
590 So. 2d 901 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1991)
McWilliams v. State
587 So. 2d 1064 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1991)
Jackson v. State
582 So. 2d 598 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1991)
Hall v. State
580 So. 2d 123 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1991)
McConnell v. State
580 So. 2d 125 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1991)
Jones v. State
585 So. 2d 180 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1991)
Hodges v. State
570 So. 2d 1252 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Fuller v. State
571 So. 2d 1285 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
McLeod v. State
581 So. 2d 1144 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Roberts v. State
563 So. 2d 1072 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)