Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K. R.

24 F. 148, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 2046
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri·Decided June 30, 1885·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Treat, J.

The demand of Josiah Fogg to charge the assets of the old and new corporations, prior in right to the mortgage sued on, is presented to the court in the form of a demurrer to the evidence taken before the master. The principles on which this demand is to be determined have heretofore been fully considered. The present inquiry pertains solely to notice given of such prior demand. The transferred assets were greater than the assumed obligations by the new corporation. Hence all persons subsequent in interest with notice of such equitable lien take subordinate thereto. The evidence discloses that, although the transfer from the old to the new corporation was not formally recorded, all the parties were sufficiently informed with respect thereto. The equitable doctrine applies, viz., that they took subject to the prior equitable lien. Demurrer overruled.

Ordered that the demand of Josiah Fogg be allowed as an equitable lien prior in right to the mortgage sued on.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K. R., 24 F. 148, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 2046 (circtedmo 1885).

24 F. 148 (Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erhard v. Boone State Bank of Boone
65 F.2d 48 (Eighth Circuit, 1933)
People's State Bank of Tyler v. Monsey Oil Co.
11 S.W.2d 507 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1928)
Fostoria Milling & Grain Co. v. Commissioner
11 B.T.A. 1401 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)
Skirvin Operating Co. v. Southwestern Electric Co.
1918 OK 503 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
Baker Motor Vehicle Co. v. Hunter
238 F. 894 (Second Circuit, 1916)
Meridian Light & Railway Co. v. Catar
60 So. 657 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1912)
Grenell v. Ferry
68 N.W. 144 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1896)