Blair v. Rutenfranz

40 Ind. 318
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 Ind. 318 (Blair v. Rutenfranz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blair v. Rutenfranz, 40 Ind. 318 (Ind. 1872).

Opinion

Downey, J.

The questions in this case, which is founded on an appeal bond given in an appeal in a liquor license [319]*319case, are the same as in Blair v. Kilpatrick, ante,p. 312; and for the reasons there given the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to grant a new trial.

D. F. Embree and W. M, Land, for appellants. J. Baker, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boomershine v. Uline
65 N.E. 513 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Ind. 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blair-v-rutenfranz-ind-1872.