Blair v. Rutenfranz

40 Ind. 318
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Downey, J.

The questions in this case, which is founded on an appeal bond given in an appeal in a liquor license [319]*319case, are the same as in Blair v. Kilpatrick, ante,p. 312; and for the reasons there given the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to grant a new trial.

D. F. Embree and W. M, Land, for appellants. J. Baker, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blair v. Rutenfranz, 40 Ind. 318 (Ind. 1872).

40 Ind. 318 (Blair v. Rutenfranz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boomershine v. Uline
65 N.E. 513 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1902)