Blair v. Redwine

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Blair v. Redwine

101 S.E. 753, 24 Ga. App. 623, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 971

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 16, 1919

Docket10857

StatusPublished

This text of 101 S.E. 753 (Blair v. Redwine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blair v. Redwine, 101 S.E. 753, 24 Ga. App. 623, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 971 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, J.

There was evidence to support the verdict in this case, the charge of the court was more favorable to the contentions of the plaintiff in error than to those of the defendant in error, and a careful consideration of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial fails to disclose any reversible error. The court therefore did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jerilcins, P. J., and Stephens, J,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, J.

There was evidence to support the verdict in this case, the charge of the court was more favorable to the contentions of the plaintiff in error than to those of the defendant in error, and a careful consideration of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial fails to disclose any reversible error. The court therefore did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jerilcins, P. J., and Stephens, J,, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 S.E. 753, 24 Ga. App. 623, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blair-v-redwine-gactapp-1919.