Blair v. Reading
96 Ill. 130
Opinion
We do not understand it to be the duty of the plaintiff in error to file his abstracts and briefs, unless the other party is in court. The plaintiff was present in court on the day the cause was called, and had no notice, or any evidence that there had been any service. Under the circumstances the plaintiff in error can not be considered as in default by reason of not having filed his abstracts and briefs.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blair v. Reading, 96 Ill. 130 (Ill. 1880).
96 Ill. 130 (Blair v. Reading) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson
100 A. 373 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1917)