Blair v. Ramsey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blair v. Ramsey

245 So. 2d 285, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6899

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 12, 1971

DocketNo. 70-750

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 So. 2d 285 (Blair v. Ramsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blair v. Ramsey, 245 So. 2d 285, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6899 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida, in a suit to set aside a deed and for other equitable relief. The trial court had two basic factual issues to resolve. One was whether or not the grantor of certain real estate in Orange County, Florida, had capacity to execute a deed on IS March 1966, and the other is whether or not that deed was the product of fraud or undue influence. From our review of the record we conclude that there was competent substantial evidence in the record to support the implied finding of the trial judge that no fraud or undue influence was practiced and that the grantor was competent. We have also reviewed each of the other points presented by the appellants and conclude that they do not demonstrate reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed. See In re Estate of Carpenter, Fla.App. 1970, 239 So. 2d 506 and In re Starr’s Estate, 1935, 125 Fla. 536, 170 So. 620.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, REED and MAGER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida, in a suit to set aside a deed and for other equitable relief. The trial court had two basic factual issues to resolve. One was whether or not the grantor of certain real estate in Orange County, Florida, had capacity to execute a deed on IS March 1966, and the other is whether or not that deed was the product of fraud or undue influence. From our review of the record we conclude that there was competent substantial evidence in the record to support the implied finding of the trial judge that no fraud or undue influence was practiced and that the grantor was competent. We have also reviewed each of the other points presented by the appellants and conclude that they do not demonstrate reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed. See In re Estate of Carpenter, Fla.App. 1970, 239 So. 2d 506 and In re Starr’s Estate, 1935, 125 Fla. 536, 170 So. 620.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, REED and MAGER, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 So. 2d 285, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blair-v-ramsey-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack